Ilona Spector: Hebrew floating quantifiers
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper addresses the issue of Floating Quantifier phenomena in Hebrew, focusing on the case of the universal quantifier kol (‘all’) and proposes a new, non-derivational analysis in the LFG framework in which the floating and the non-floating quantifier constructions are treated separately. This is based on semantic evidence showing that the quantifiers in these constructions have non-identical semantic effects. Thus, there is no need to assume a derivational relation between the two constructions. I propose to analyze the Floating Quantifier construction in Hebrew as an instance of Topicalization, accompanied by Triggered Inversion. The incorporated pronoun on the floating quantifier is explained by the Extended Coherence Principle, when the pronoun is anaphorically bound by the topic. The pragmatic markedness of this construction naturally follows from this analysis, it being an instance of Topicalization. 1
منابع مشابه
Alternative Semantics for the Hebrew Determiner Eyze
In the recent linguistic literature, much attention has been devoted to the semantics and pragmatics of indefinite NPs. One of the issues that have been addressed is how different indefinite determiners in various languages contribute to the interpretation of the NP or of the whole sentence. The purpose of this talk is, hopefully, to make a further contribution to this investigation by examinin...
متن کاملThe Syntactic and Semantic Roots of Floating Quantification
Through the study of floating quantifiers in a variety of languages, I demonstrate that floating quantification is not a uniform phenomenon and outline a series of puzzles that force us to adopt a two-part analysis. I argue that certain floating quantifiers are related to their nominal associate by syntactic transformation (the stranding approach, Sportiche 1988; Miyagawa 1989) and that others ...
متن کاملSemantic Properties of (Non-)Floating Quantifiers and their Syntactic Implications1
It is well-known that, in Japanese, classifier phrases (ClPs) (e.g., 3 classifier) or measure phrases (MPs) (e.g., 3 liters) can ‘float’ in that they can be separated from the host noun, as in (1b) and (2b).2 ClPs and MPs in this configuration are referred to as floating quantifiers (FQs), and their non-floated counterparts in (1a) and (2a) in which ClPs or MPs are adjacent to their host noun a...
متن کاملThe Distribution of Floating Quantifiers: A Dependency Grammar Analysis
This contribution provides a dependency grammar analysis of the distribution of floating quantifiers in English and German. Floating quantifiers are deemed to be “base generated”, meaning that they are not moved into their surface position by a transformation. Their distribution is similar to that of modal adverbs. The nominal (noun or pronoun) over which they quantify is an argument of the pre...
متن کامل(Non)floating Quantifiers in Japanese
This paper suggests that the continuation-passing style (CPS), a classic technique commonly used in computer science but that has recently been successfully applied to linguistics as in the case of Barker (2002) and others, accounts for different interpretations for floating quantifiers (FQ) and non-floating quantifiers (nonFQ). In a determinerless language such as Japanese, the interpretation ...
متن کامل